State Michigan

EdGate Curriculum Matrix
MICHIGAN State Standards
December 2005

Curriculum Matrix Standards Michigan standards are organized by: 
Early Elementary (EE - K - 2);
Later Elementary (LE - 3 - 5);
Middle School (MS - 6 -8);
High School (HS - 9 -12)

 
Subject by Subject  Data for Michigan
Subject State Adoption Date Matrix version (date) ICLE Data for Michigan
LANGUAGE ARTS March 2004 March 2004 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9-12 (with test data)
MATHEMATICS March 2004 March 2004 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9-12 (with test data)
SCIENCE June 2000 June 2000 5, 8,11 (with test data)
SOCIAL STUDIES July 1995 July 1995 n/a
ARTS EDUCATION July 1995 July 1995 n/a
CAREER & TECHNICAL EDUCATION June 2005 June 2005 (K-8); CAREER CLUSTERS and SCANS (9-12) n/a
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS n/a TESOL National n/a
HEALTH AND PHYSICAL EDUCATION July 1995 July 1995 n/a
LIBRARY MEDIA n/a ALA National Standards n/a
WORLD LANGUAGES July 1998 July 1998 n/a
Standards 
FAQ's 
Official Name:  Michigan Curriculum Framework

Official Web site: http://www.michigan.gov/documents/MichiganCurriculumFramework_8172_7.pdf

State Testing occurs at:
Language Arts: Grade 4, 7,11
Mathematics: Grade 4, 8, 11
Science: Grade 5, 8, 11
Social Studies: Grade 5, 8, 11

From the Introduction to the Michigan Curriculum Framework:
The Michigan Curriculum Framework is a resource for helping Michigan's public and private schools design, implement, and assess their core content area curricula. The content standards identified in this document are presented as models for the development of local district curriculum by the Michigan State Board of Education and the Michigan Department of Education. They represent rigorous expectations for student performance, and describe the knowledge and abilities needed to be successful in today's society. When content, instruction, and local and state assessments are aligned, they become powerful forces that contribute to the success of student achievement.

  The framework presents a content and a process for developing curriculum that enables schools to realize Michigan's vision for K-12 education: Michigan's K-12 education will ensure that all students will develop their potential in order to lead productive and satisfying lives. All students will engage in challenging and purposeful learning that blends their experiences with content knowledge and real-world applications in preparation for their adult roles, which include becoming literate individuals, healthy and fit people, responsible family members, productive workers, involved citizens and self-directed,lifelong learners.

The intent of this document is to provide useful resources to districts as they strive to implement a program which ensures that all students reap the benefits of a quality education and achieve the adult roles described in Michigan's vision for K-12 education. The content standards and benchmarks serve as worthy goals for all students as they develop the knowledge and abilities inherent in their adult roles. They represent an essential component in the process of continuous school improvement, which like professional development, should be focused on improving student achievement.

The framework emphasizes the importance of:

  • using continuous school improvement to align all district initiatives for the purpose of increasing student achievement;
  • building a curriculum based on rigorous content standards and benchmarks;
  • using student achievement data to make decisions about continuous school improvement, curriculum, instruction, and professional development; and,
  • incorporating research-supported teaching and learning standards into daily instructional practice

BACKGROUND

In 1993, the Michigan Department of Education, in collaboration with representatives from five state universities, was awarded federal funding from the U.S. Department of Education to develop curriculum framework components for English language arts, mathematics, science, and geography. In addition, the Michigan Council for the Social Studies offered, and was supported by the State Board of Education, to develop a curriculum framework component for social studies which would include history, economics, and American government, and would be complementary to the geography framework.
The Michigan Curriculum Framework brings together the work of individual content area projects to present a unified view of curriculum, one which addresses the educational needs of the whole learner. The goal of the curriculum framework is to improve student achievement by aligning classroom instruction with core curriculum content standards and national content standards. It is designed to be used as a process for the decision-making that guides continuous school improvement. It describes curriculum, instruction, and assessment and focuses on improving program quality by aligning all the processes that affect a student's achievement of rigorous content standards.

Framework project co-directors, university representatives, and the Michigan Department of Education content area consultants met regularly with members of their content area professional organizations to design the components of the curriculum framework. Committees of teachers and university personnel worked together to draft the content standards, benchmarks, and performance standards for their specific content areas.

Co-directors met on a monthly basis to coordinate the efforts of the various content area committees in developing K-12 standards and benchmarks for their subject areas. Their purpose was to ensure that the framework represents a consistent view of curriculum across content areas. They wanted to facilitate continuous school improvement by emphasizing commonalities among the content areas with regard to professional development, assessment, and instruction.

The co-directors were guided by a Joint Steering Committee comprised of representatives from the content areas, parents, business leaders, labor leaders, house and senate staff, and educators. Joint Steering Committee members reviewed the framework projects at each phase of their development and made recommendations for improving their quality. Their insight helped the co-directors incorporate the views of all of Michigan's interested parties into the final framework document.

WHAT IS IN THE FRAMEWORK?

The framework includes the resources needed to develop a standards-based curriculum. Standards and benchmarks for English language arts, mathematics, science, and social studies are included in this edition of the framework. Standards and benchmarks for arts education, career and employability skills, health education, life management education, physical education, technology education, and world languages will be added to the next edition of the framework. The process described in the framework will be expanded to incorporate the additional core content areas when they are completed. The chart on page vi provides a list of the materials that eventually will be included in the framework document.

 

Additional Information If you have any questions, please call EdGate Customer Care at 1-877-705-1084 
or email info@edgate.com

  
INTERNATIONAL CENTER PRIORITIZATION OF STANDARDS
The following information is contributed by the International Center for Leadership in Education and is a summary of standards priorities based on state assessments and International Center research. The details of these priorities are included in the print form  -  Aligning Standards (available through the International Center) or in the electronic form (available through EdGate).

 

 

 

MEAP

Curriculum Survey

English LA*

# Standards

# Benchmarks

H

M

L

No Q

H

1-35

M

36-70

L

71 +

Early Elementary

12

55

Not Tested

38

9

8

Elementary

Test 4th Grade

12

55

25

10

20

39

11

5

Middle School

Test 7th Grade

12

55

24

10

21

44

7

4

High School

Test 11th Grade

12

55

23

9

23

44

6

5

Mathematics

# Standards

# Benchmarks

H

M

L

No Q

H

1-35

M

36-70

L

71 +

Elementary

Test 4th Grade

15

74

53

5

16

58

2

14

Middle School

Test 7th Grade

15

77

48

22

7

60

7

10

High School

Test 11th Grade

15

77

53

9

15

39

17

21

Science

# Standards

# Benchmarks

H

M

L

No Q

H

1-35

M

36-70

L

71 +

Elementary

Test 5th Grade

15

53

17

23

13

32

14

7

Middle School

Test 8th Grade

15

65

14

22

29

43

12

10

High School

Test 11th Grade

15

60

4

10

46

40

12

8

                     

 *  English language arts MEAP assessments are based on new standards and benchmarks.  The new assessments are scheduled for release in 2003.

 

#  Benchmarks

#  Benchmarks Tested

%  Benchmarks Tested

English LA

(Grades 4, 7, 11)

165

101

61 %

Mathematics

(Grades 4, 7, 11)

228

190

83 %

Science

(Grades 4, 8, 11)

178

90

51 %

Michigan Curriculum Matrix Summary - MEAP High, Medium, and Low Designations

English Language Arts

A review of the Michigan MEAP Test Schedules identified that the English language arts integrated assessment will first be used in 2003.  Until then, the MEAP reading and writing assessments will be based on the “old” Essential Goals and Objectives.

 

The data used in the ICLE Curriculum Matrix is based on the new standards and the Assessment Plan 2002 that will be used in 2003.

 

A High designation was given to the benchmark if a “direct link” (D) to the MEAP assessment was identified.  A Medium designation was given if an “indirect link” (I) was identified.  A Low designation was given if a “district/classroom link” (C) was identified.

Mathematics

A High, Medium, or Low designation was determined by a review of the MEAP Mathematics Assessment Model, April 2001, Distribution of Items by Strand, and MEAP Assessable Content document.  The percentage of total test items on the assessment by strand was used.

 

A high designation was given to the strand if the percent of distribution was 11 % or higher.  A Medium designation was given to the strand if the percent of distribution was 1-10%.  A low designation was given if the benchmark was identified as “not testable” on the statewide assessment.

Science

A High, Medium, or Low designation was determined by a review of the Science Assessment Plan 2002, Assessment Blueprint with Level-Content Emphasis and MEAP Assessable Content document.  The percentage of total points on the assessment by strand was used.

 

A high designation was given to the strand if the percent of distribution was 16 % or higher.  A Medium designation was given to the strand if the percent of distribution was 1-15%.  A low designation was given if the benchmark was identified as “not testable” on the statewide assessment.